im planing on selling 2 xbox originalsfat ps2gamecubefat dsgbagb micro (famicom version)around 15 games for gamecube around 20 games for ps2 around 20 games for xboxaround 7 games for gba around 5 games for dsand some accessorise for each systemand each come with all cords and 2 controllers each around how much do u think i should sell each thing and were should i sell it im trying to get enough money to buy a wii selling systems got ????
I might be interested in an xbox. And what games do you have for ps2 and xbox?selling systems got ????
i dont remember them because there at my other house but some of them are kingdom hearts 2 a couple of final fantasy games some tony hawk games for the ps2
[QUOTE=''xmitchconnorx'']And what games do you have for ps2 and xbox?[/QUOTE]i 2nd that question
it depends on where your planning on selling all of it, what games they are, and what kinda condition all of it is in, but you should be able to get a couple hundred for all of that, if you have the patience for it, you could probably ebay everything and make a hundred or two more
Sounds like enough to get a Wii
ok thanks for your help
Put it on ebay and sell each system seperately. You'll definitely get more if you sell seperately. An original xbox goes for around 30-60 bucks, but people who are looking for an xbox probably don't want all the extra stuff. I bought an Xbox, Dreamcast, 2 N64's and a Genesis all in a lot for 50 bucks.
You will make more if you sell each item sepertatly or in as many transatctions as possible, It is tempting to sell it as one or 2 wholesale lots because it is easy, but you could prob make an extra $80-100 if you sold EVERY item individually. You just need a lot of patience and be willing to list each item. PM me if you have questions, I sold 70 seperate items all at once not too long ago.I would suggest Ebay as being the best place to sell most of your games. Also, Are you sure you want to sell all of your Gamecube games? Your wii is backwards compatible so you can still play those games. Why not keep a few of your favorite Gamecube games around? The difference will only be $20-30.
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Nintendo 64 Memory Expansion Pack.
Do you need a memory expansion pack for a N64 to play most games. Also do all games save on to controller paks.Cheers morphies_emuNintendo 64 Memory Expansion Pack.
1 not most require it ,some do like donkey kong 64 zelda 00t perfect dark required it for solo mode and some other features 2 no not all games save on mem card theres a few that do like turok some require it like turok some use it optionally Nintendo 64 Memory Expansion Pack.
[QUOTE=''mariokart64fan'']1 not most require it ,some do like donkey kong 64 zelda 00t perfect dark required it for solo mode and some other features 2 no not all games save on mem card theres a few that do like turok some require it like turok some use it optionally[/QUOTE]OoT does not require a memory expansion. It came out before the memory expansion was available.However, Majora's Mask does require it.There are also a lot of games that may not require it but having it is highly recomended for better performance (i.e. Turok 2)
As stated before, but to summarize...Most games do not need the expansion pack and will not look or play any better with or without it. Some games recommend it but it is not required. A few games require it.The contoller pack memory card is used by some games to save but most games save directly to the cartridge. It is a good idea to have one because you never know wht game you might get needs the card.
1 not most require it ,some do like donkey kong 64 zelda 00t perfect dark required it for solo mode and some other features 2 no not all games save on mem card theres a few that do like turok some require it like turok some use it optionally Nintendo 64 Memory Expansion Pack.
[QUOTE=''mariokart64fan'']1 not most require it ,some do like donkey kong 64 zelda 00t perfect dark required it for solo mode and some other features 2 no not all games save on mem card theres a few that do like turok some require it like turok some use it optionally[/QUOTE]OoT does not require a memory expansion. It came out before the memory expansion was available.However, Majora's Mask does require it.There are also a lot of games that may not require it but having it is highly recomended for better performance (i.e. Turok 2)
As stated before, but to summarize...Most games do not need the expansion pack and will not look or play any better with or without it. Some games recommend it but it is not required. A few games require it.The contoller pack memory card is used by some games to save but most games save directly to the cartridge. It is a good idea to have one because you never know wht game you might get needs the card.
Best RPG that had Mario as the main character.
Im gonna say Super Mario RPG. Best RPG that had Mario as the main character.
Super Mario RPG is highly overrated. It's a good game, but it was very basic at the core. My vote goes to Paper Mario: The Thousand Year Door.Best RPG that had Mario as the main character.
super mario RPG it was cool
Paper Mario: Thousand Year Door. Beautiful game.
mario rpg for snes without a doubt
[QUOTE=''Ranteal''] Im gonna say Super Mario RPG. [/QUOTE]same with me
I'd have to say Paper Mario: The Ten Thousand Year Old Door
I think like Paper Mario for the N64 the best.
Paper Mario TTYD
Paper Mario: Thousand Year Door,easily.
[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]
[QUOTE=''famicommander'']Super Mario RPG is highly overrated. It's a good game, but it was very basic at the core. My vote goes to Paper Mario: The Thousand Year Door.[/QUOTE]Tis is teh blasphemy!!!11!one~!!!Super Mario RPG was one of the best games for the SNES. It had really good graphics for the time, an awesome story, creative enemies, cool weapons and items, and it had a nice challenge.Although I have to agree with you- PM:TTYD was a really awesome game. It was way better than the one for N64 and Super Paper Mario for Wii...[QUOTE=''yentar480'']I'd have to say Paper Mario: The Ten Thousand Year Old Door .[/QUOTE] This is one of the worst Video game name-butcherings i've ever seen.
[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]
Paper Mario
either the first paper mario (TTYD wasn't as good)but I think I'm gonna have to go with Mario %26 Luigi: Superstar Saga
Super Mario RPG, love that game!
Correct Me If I'm Wrong Are You All Forgetting Super Mario 64 For Nintendo 64.It Is One Of The Best Games Ever.Its Better Than Assassins Creed
most def super mario rpg for snes
Super Mario RPG, it is the only one just fo-*shot*
I'll have to say it too. Super Mario RPG: The Legend of the Seven Stars. EPIC!!!1!!1!!!!!!1!!
Super Mario RPG is highly overrated. It's a good game, but it was very basic at the core. My vote goes to Paper Mario: The Thousand Year Door.Best RPG that had Mario as the main character.
super mario RPG it was cool
Paper Mario: Thousand Year Door. Beautiful game.
mario rpg for snes without a doubt
[QUOTE=''Ranteal''] Im gonna say Super Mario RPG. [/QUOTE]same with me
I'd have to say Paper Mario: The Ten Thousand Year Old Door
I think like Paper Mario for the N64 the best.
Paper Mario TTYD
Paper Mario: Thousand Year Door,easily.
[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]
[QUOTE=''famicommander'']Super Mario RPG is highly overrated. It's a good game, but it was very basic at the core. My vote goes to Paper Mario: The Thousand Year Door.[/QUOTE]Tis is teh blasphemy!!!11!one~!!!Super Mario RPG was one of the best games for the SNES. It had really good graphics for the time, an awesome story, creative enemies, cool weapons and items, and it had a nice challenge.Although I have to agree with you- PM:TTYD was a really awesome game. It was way better than the one for N64 and Super Paper Mario for Wii...[QUOTE=''yentar480'']I'd have to say Paper Mario: The Ten Thousand Year Old Door .[/QUOTE] This is one of the worst Video game name-butcherings i've ever seen.
[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]
Paper Mario
either the first paper mario (TTYD wasn't as good)but I think I'm gonna have to go with Mario %26 Luigi: Superstar Saga
Super Mario RPG, love that game!
Correct Me If I'm Wrong Are You All Forgetting Super Mario 64 For Nintendo 64.It Is One Of The Best Games Ever.Its Better Than Assassins Creed
most def super mario rpg for snes
Super Mario RPG, it is the only one just fo-*shot*
I'll have to say it too. Super Mario RPG: The Legend of the Seven Stars. EPIC!!!1!!1!!!!!!1!!
Which classic game has aged the worst?
Can you name any noteworthy games from back-in-the-day that look so bad now, that you can hardly look at them anymore?I just had a wake up call on the original Wild Arms. I used to think this game looked great. Almost amazing.
Now, I can't stand looking at the game for more than a few minutes. Especially the battles. I mean wow, it's not at all like I remember it.
I bet there's probably alot of games from the 32-bit era that have aged poorly.Have you ever gone back to play an old-school game, but gave up on it because it just looked too crappy?Which classic game has aged the worst?
Star Fox 64 or Super Mario 64Which classic game has aged the worst?
Obviously the visuals wont look so pretty now, but i've never been put off playing a game now that I enjoyed back in the day.
i would say tomb raider. series were a blast back then, now is seems like a chore. However, since TR:Anniversary came out, i might reserve judgement till the next one.
[QUOTE=''Conjuration'']Can you name any noteworthy games from back-in-the-day that look so bad now, that you can hardly look at them anymore?I just had a wake up call on the original Wild Arms. I used to think this game looked great. Almost amazing.
Now, I can't stand looking at the game for more than a few minutes. Especially the battles. I mean wow, it's not at all like I remember it.
I bet there's probably alot of games from the 32-bit era that have aged poorly.Have you ever gone back to play an old-school game, but gave up on it because it just looked too crappy?[/QUOTE] I still love Wild Arms, but if you like, a remake was released for the PS2 not too long ago. I personally can't say I like it more than the original thanks to the added 3D graphics. Playing it I hardly remember anything.I love Twisted Metal II, but now its hard to believe we could play with the graphics looking the way they did. 8-bit and 16-bit seem to hold up fine since that's the 5tyle they were in. The biggest differences come between PS1/N64 and the current generation of gaming. Talk about leaps and bounds.
None for me becuase I think a game is always fun no matter how old as long it is a good game
Gex II, My cousin gave me the game and i rememeber playing it ten years ago. The game has not aged well.
syphon filter 1 and 2... aghhhto be honest, any of the early 3d games look terrible.2d games age very well :)
I'd say Medievil from PS1, Ghost'n Goblins arcade(used to look in awe to that game back then when I was rugrat), even ocarina of time and majora's mask hurt a little on my eyes. Never did I think I'd say this about these games I looked up to so much, but I have to admit graphically they haven't aged well at all.Gameplay wise Final Fight arcade comes to mind. Adored the game back then when it was at the arcade, but replaying it today on my Capcom Classics Collection certainly opened up my eyes. The game is just to simplistic and now I don't need extra coins to finish it, the game isn't as deep as I thought.
Ocarina I believe has suffered a bit (with the really near pop-up distance of enemies and really blurry textures)--Majora's Mask, on the otherhand, has aged fairly gracefully I think. Since it was made with the N64 expansion pack the pop up distance isn't so painful and the textures at least tolerable. (and if you play it emulated on the PC the save sytem can be completely circumvented)Another N64 classic, Goldeneye 007, is unfortunately now completely horrible. FPSs have just evolved too much over the years, whereas the formula of fantasy adventures and RPGs aren't so reliant on tech capabilities.
[QUOTE=''Raiko101'']Obviously the visuals wont look so pretty now, but i've never been put off playing a game now that I enjoyed back in the day. [/QUOTE]same here
Resident evil 2 on the n64 looked like complete garbage, it was good back in its day but when I picked it up today ive noticed that the graphics were bad and there mouths didnt move so I stopped playing it
[QUOTE=''jedinat''] Ocarina I believe has suffered a bit (with the really near pop-up distance of enemies and really blurry textures)--Majora's Mask, on the otherhand, has aged fairly gracefully I think. Since it was made with the N64 expansion pack the pop up distance isn't so painful and the textures at least tolerable. (and if you play it emulated on the PC the save sytem can be completely circumvented)Another N64 classic, Goldeneye 007, is unfortunately now completely horrible. FPSs have just evolved too much over the years, whereas the formula of fantasy adventures and RPGs aren't so reliant on tech capabilities. [/QUOTE]I have to agree with you my brother started him a game on oot and i couldnt believe how bad the game looked lol however its still my fav game of all time.:P
OoT honestly looked pretty good to me when I played it for the first time last year (although I did play the higher-resolution Collector's Edition version, so maybe there was a small difference).
Tough to say, I mean most games I enjoy were not for their graphics but for their depth, and that never deminishes.
i say anything from the ps1/n64 era didn't age well. also pc games like medal of honor:allied assault are horrible now
[QUOTE=''Funkyhamster'']OoT honestly looked pretty good to me when I played it for the first time last year (although I did play the higher-resolution Collector's Edition version, so maybe there was a small difference).[/QUOTE]The graphics aren't so bad. I was mostly replying to the post above mine which had lumped Ocarina and Majora's together--aging equally as badly. I wanted to point out that Majora's fares a bit better than OoT, otherwise I would not have mentioned either game in a thread about those that have ''aged the worst.'' And in reply to jsmoke: you can not so simply throw out all ps1 and n64 games for their graphics. Gameplay aside, some--especially certain 2D ones on ps--are quite beautiful still. (playing Valkyrie Profile and FFIX right now. both are very good looking games--especially on high resolutions with custom shaders and all that jazz ;))
final fantasy 7
Almost any early '3D' game. N64 games tend to be the worst ~ feat. poor draw distances, simple textures+polygons and generally fuzzy visuals.
[QUOTE=''TheLegendKnight'']final fantasy 7[/QUOTE]people always hated the (non-cutscene) graphics in that game though. block hands! wtf?my vote goes for Guardian Legend. I played it new when it came out for the NES and thought it was amazing. Big bosses and plenty of great game play. But looking back now... ugly and 2D.![]()
I still play it and love it. but its just not the same as it was.
Now, I can't stand looking at the game for more than a few minutes. Especially the battles. I mean wow, it's not at all like I remember it.
I bet there's probably alot of games from the 32-bit era that have aged poorly.Have you ever gone back to play an old-school game, but gave up on it because it just looked too crappy?Which classic game has aged the worst?
Star Fox 64 or Super Mario 64Which classic game has aged the worst?
Obviously the visuals wont look so pretty now, but i've never been put off playing a game now that I enjoyed back in the day.
i would say tomb raider. series were a blast back then, now is seems like a chore. However, since TR:Anniversary came out, i might reserve judgement till the next one.
[QUOTE=''Conjuration'']Can you name any noteworthy games from back-in-the-day that look so bad now, that you can hardly look at them anymore?I just had a wake up call on the original Wild Arms. I used to think this game looked great. Almost amazing.
Now, I can't stand looking at the game for more than a few minutes. Especially the battles. I mean wow, it's not at all like I remember it.
I bet there's probably alot of games from the 32-bit era that have aged poorly.Have you ever gone back to play an old-school game, but gave up on it because it just looked too crappy?[/QUOTE] I still love Wild Arms, but if you like, a remake was released for the PS2 not too long ago. I personally can't say I like it more than the original thanks to the added 3D graphics. Playing it I hardly remember anything.I love Twisted Metal II, but now its hard to believe we could play with the graphics looking the way they did. 8-bit and 16-bit seem to hold up fine since that's the 5tyle they were in. The biggest differences come between PS1/N64 and the current generation of gaming. Talk about leaps and bounds.
None for me becuase I think a game is always fun no matter how old as long it is a good game
Gex II, My cousin gave me the game and i rememeber playing it ten years ago. The game has not aged well.
syphon filter 1 and 2... aghhhto be honest, any of the early 3d games look terrible.2d games age very well :)
I'd say Medievil from PS1, Ghost'n Goblins arcade(used to look in awe to that game back then when I was rugrat), even ocarina of time and majora's mask hurt a little on my eyes. Never did I think I'd say this about these games I looked up to so much, but I have to admit graphically they haven't aged well at all.Gameplay wise Final Fight arcade comes to mind. Adored the game back then when it was at the arcade, but replaying it today on my Capcom Classics Collection certainly opened up my eyes. The game is just to simplistic and now I don't need extra coins to finish it, the game isn't as deep as I thought.
Ocarina I believe has suffered a bit (with the really near pop-up distance of enemies and really blurry textures)--Majora's Mask, on the otherhand, has aged fairly gracefully I think. Since it was made with the N64 expansion pack the pop up distance isn't so painful and the textures at least tolerable. (and if you play it emulated on the PC the save sytem can be completely circumvented)Another N64 classic, Goldeneye 007, is unfortunately now completely horrible. FPSs have just evolved too much over the years, whereas the formula of fantasy adventures and RPGs aren't so reliant on tech capabilities.
[QUOTE=''Raiko101'']Obviously the visuals wont look so pretty now, but i've never been put off playing a game now that I enjoyed back in the day. [/QUOTE]same here
Resident evil 2 on the n64 looked like complete garbage, it was good back in its day but when I picked it up today ive noticed that the graphics were bad and there mouths didnt move so I stopped playing it
[QUOTE=''jedinat''] Ocarina I believe has suffered a bit (with the really near pop-up distance of enemies and really blurry textures)--Majora's Mask, on the otherhand, has aged fairly gracefully I think. Since it was made with the N64 expansion pack the pop up distance isn't so painful and the textures at least tolerable. (and if you play it emulated on the PC the save sytem can be completely circumvented)Another N64 classic, Goldeneye 007, is unfortunately now completely horrible. FPSs have just evolved too much over the years, whereas the formula of fantasy adventures and RPGs aren't so reliant on tech capabilities. [/QUOTE]I have to agree with you my brother started him a game on oot and i couldnt believe how bad the game looked lol however its still my fav game of all time.:P
OoT honestly looked pretty good to me when I played it for the first time last year (although I did play the higher-resolution Collector's Edition version, so maybe there was a small difference).
Tough to say, I mean most games I enjoy were not for their graphics but for their depth, and that never deminishes.
i say anything from the ps1/n64 era didn't age well. also pc games like medal of honor:allied assault are horrible now
[QUOTE=''Funkyhamster'']OoT honestly looked pretty good to me when I played it for the first time last year (although I did play the higher-resolution Collector's Edition version, so maybe there was a small difference).[/QUOTE]The graphics aren't so bad. I was mostly replying to the post above mine which had lumped Ocarina and Majora's together--aging equally as badly. I wanted to point out that Majora's fares a bit better than OoT, otherwise I would not have mentioned either game in a thread about those that have ''aged the worst.'' And in reply to jsmoke: you can not so simply throw out all ps1 and n64 games for their graphics. Gameplay aside, some--especially certain 2D ones on ps--are quite beautiful still. (playing Valkyrie Profile and FFIX right now. both are very good looking games--especially on high resolutions with custom shaders and all that jazz ;))
final fantasy 7
Almost any early '3D' game. N64 games tend to be the worst ~ feat. poor draw distances, simple textures+polygons and generally fuzzy visuals.
[QUOTE=''TheLegendKnight'']final fantasy 7[/QUOTE]people always hated the (non-cutscene) graphics in that game though. block hands! wtf?my vote goes for Guardian Legend. I played it new when it came out for the NES and thought it was amazing. Big bosses and plenty of great game play. But looking back now... ugly and 2D.
What's that N64 game
Where your this green tank blowing up other tanks and buildings.EDIT: the cart was green colored (like that DK 64 game had a yellow cart)What's that N64 game
BattletanxWhat's that N64 game
[QUOTE=''Alter_Echo'']Battletanx[/QUOTE] Yes that was it, thanks.
If you want to stump me you have to try harder than that:P
[QUOTE=''Alter_Echo'']If you want to stump me you have to try harder than that:P [/QUOTE]You probably would have gotten it if he just said, ''Tanks, N64.'' lol
Actually, with research I found that it was the 2nd one, global assault (I guess it was the only one with a green cart).
is it a good game and did they revive it for the gc or wii?
[QUOTE=''alma996'']is it a good game and did they revive it for the gc or wii?[/QUOTE] Yeah it was ''Good'' (not great zelda-like) and No, just on the N64 and the PS1.
Battle Tanx: Global Assault is one of my all time favorite N64 games. Loved playing multiplayer with my friends. Kick ass
[QUOTE=''planetvash112''][QUOTE=''alma996'']is it a good game and did they revive it for the gc or wii?[/QUOTE] Yeah it was ''Good'' (not great zelda-like) and No, just on the N64 and the PS1.[/QUOTE]Try Vigilante 8 its very similar.
[QUOTE=''Alter_Echo'']Battletanx[/QUOTE]That was a fun game!:)
[QUOTE=''nVidiaGaMer''][QUOTE=''planetvash112''] [QUOTE=''alma996'']is it a good game and did they revive it for the gc or wii?[/QUOTE] Yeah it was ''Good'' (not great zelda-like) and No, just on the N64 and the PS1.[/QUOTE]Try Vigilante 8 its very similar. [/QUOTE]Both of them were a lot of fun.
BattletanxWhat's that N64 game
[QUOTE=''Alter_Echo'']Battletanx[/QUOTE] Yes that was it, thanks.
If you want to stump me you have to try harder than that:P
[QUOTE=''Alter_Echo'']If you want to stump me you have to try harder than that:P [/QUOTE]You probably would have gotten it if he just said, ''Tanks, N64.'' lol
Actually, with research I found that it was the 2nd one, global assault (I guess it was the only one with a green cart).
is it a good game and did they revive it for the gc or wii?
[QUOTE=''alma996'']is it a good game and did they revive it for the gc or wii?[/QUOTE] Yeah it was ''Good'' (not great zelda-like) and No, just on the N64 and the PS1.
Battle Tanx: Global Assault is one of my all time favorite N64 games. Loved playing multiplayer with my friends. Kick ass
[QUOTE=''planetvash112''][QUOTE=''alma996'']is it a good game and did they revive it for the gc or wii?[/QUOTE] Yeah it was ''Good'' (not great zelda-like) and No, just on the N64 and the PS1.[/QUOTE]Try Vigilante 8 its very similar.
[QUOTE=''Alter_Echo'']Battletanx[/QUOTE]That was a fun game!:)
[QUOTE=''nVidiaGaMer''][QUOTE=''planetvash112''] [QUOTE=''alma996'']is it a good game and did they revive it for the gc or wii?[/QUOTE] Yeah it was ''Good'' (not great zelda-like) and No, just on the N64 and the PS1.[/QUOTE]Try Vigilante 8 its very similar. [/QUOTE]Both of them were a lot of fun.
SO:Till the End of Time
Hi, I'm not sure if this is the place to ask, but I just bought this game used, and I got 1 disc but on it, it says ''disc 1.'' This lead me to believe their are more than one disc to this game, but I'm not sure. Should I take it back or is their only one disc to this game? Thanks.SO:Till the End of Time
There are 2 discs, I'd take it back and get the other one.SO:Till the End of Time
Alright. Thanks man.
There are 2 disks...So i'd take it back and get the other disk or get a refund...
That game consists of two discs. Go back to Gamestop and tell them you only received one.
[QUOTE=''Devourment423'']Hi, I'm not sure if this is the place to ask, but I just bought this game used, and I got 1 disc but on it, it says ''disc 1.'' This lead me to believe their are more than one disc to this game, but I'm not sure. Should I take it back or is their only one disc to this game? Thanks.[/QUOTE] What's SO
star ocean: silver star story complete
[QUOTE=''aoshi_shinumori'']star ocean: silver star story complete[/QUOTE] You're confusing Star Ocean with Lunar.....
i was only kidding! hehehe
there are two diskk for the game dude send it back and get a new one
[QUOTE=''aoshi_shinumori'']i was only kidding! hehehe[/QUOTE] No you weren't, hehehe.
there is 2eyeshadow color
There are 2 discs, I'd take it back and get the other one.SO:Till the End of Time
Alright. Thanks man.
There are 2 disks...So i'd take it back and get the other disk or get a refund...
That game consists of two discs. Go back to Gamestop and tell them you only received one.
[QUOTE=''Devourment423'']Hi, I'm not sure if this is the place to ask, but I just bought this game used, and I got 1 disc but on it, it says ''disc 1.'' This lead me to believe their are more than one disc to this game, but I'm not sure. Should I take it back or is their only one disc to this game? Thanks.[/QUOTE] What's SO
star ocean: silver star story complete
[QUOTE=''aoshi_shinumori'']star ocean: silver star story complete[/QUOTE] You're confusing Star Ocean with Lunar.....
i was only kidding! hehehe
there are two diskk for the game dude send it back and get a new one
[QUOTE=''aoshi_shinumori'']i was only kidding! hehehe[/QUOTE] No you weren't, hehehe.
there is 2
Is Dirge of Cerberus really that bad?
Really?Is Dirge of Cerberus really that bad?
Dirge of Cerberus is a very by the numbers third person shooter. It has some good story filler and some pretty amazing Advent Children quality FMV's. It's nothing revolutionary, and it certainly wont blow you away, but if you happen to be a fan of the whole FF 7 universe, and your looking for some back story on Vincent, it is definitely enjoyable.Is Dirge of Cerberus really that bad?
Yes, it is. I've played it, and it was bad. The only redeeming quality is the sheer badassness of the game.
It's really more of an average very linear shooter than anything. It's not atrocious, just not really great either. Not a buyer at all.
It's a VERY tedious game. I rented it and played a little while through and saw no reason to finish it
Short answer, Yes....Long answer? Yeeeeeeeeeeeeessssssssss :).....but yeah it was a really bad game imo. The only real reason I'd buy it is if is was cheap enough....and I wanted to collect EVERY FF game.
I don't think it's a sbad as some pepole say it is. It's a pretty solid game. Not worth paying top dollar for, but for the right price, I'd get it.
Stay away from that game!
i don't like the game.... terrible.. i just played it for the story.
Well since hearing its bad i never played it.
Wow, this is more unanimous than I expected. I guess it really does suck. Alas.
= not fun
its a load of crap
It was pretty terrible. Im not going to lie and say i finished it because i didnt....i just couldnt stomach such mediocrity.
not really it was label bad for the fans of the game where hoping to have and rpg but then got a 3rd person shooter so thats why it's bad for my oppinniion i think that this game is just good
i played a little of it and for a 3rd person shooter its decent with a good backstory. i think the ff7 fans were expecting some kind of ''uber-epikz gamezorz'' and instead got a decent 3rd person shooter with some nice cg scenes.
As a final fantasy fan I really enjoyed it, it's kinda like a shooter with rp:Dg elements but well worth a try if you can get it cheap.Does get a bit repetetive later on in the game.. but I wasn't bothered, I wrote a review for it, If you visit my profile you should find it :D
Dirge isn't what I would call a bad game. It looks very nice, and it's got a decent soundtrack and good voice acting going for it. Part of what everyone hated about it was that they just expected a much better game because it had Final Fantasy in the title. Dirge of Cerberus isn't a great game, but it's certainly not bad. It's short, but the story is good, and if your really big on the FF7 story and characters there is a lot of neat stuff going on. If your only a passing fan of FF7, passing meaning played it once and didn't really get the story but thought it was cool, then you'll get even less out of it. If you've played FF7 enough times to get the story as well as Crisis Core and watched Advent Children you'll get a lot more out of it. I'm a big FF 7 fan and I actually rather enjoyed Dirge of Cerberus. Thing is that I knew it wasn't going to be amazing. If you play it expecting little (aka an open mind) you shouldn't have trouble having a good time.
the things I've heard about Dirge of Cerberus is that the game is 'decent' but only made better by how much you're a FFVII fanboy
[QUOTE=''Ice_52'']It's a VERY tedious game. I rented it and played a little while through and saw no reason to finish it[/QUOTE] Same.
Dirge of Cerberus is a very by the numbers third person shooter. It has some good story filler and some pretty amazing Advent Children quality FMV's. It's nothing revolutionary, and it certainly wont blow you away, but if you happen to be a fan of the whole FF 7 universe, and your looking for some back story on Vincent, it is definitely enjoyable.Is Dirge of Cerberus really that bad?
Yes, it is. I've played it, and it was bad. The only redeeming quality is the sheer badassness of the game.
It's really more of an average very linear shooter than anything. It's not atrocious, just not really great either. Not a buyer at all.
It's a VERY tedious game. I rented it and played a little while through and saw no reason to finish it
Short answer, Yes....Long answer? Yeeeeeeeeeeeeessssssssss :).....but yeah it was a really bad game imo. The only real reason I'd buy it is if is was cheap enough....and I wanted to collect EVERY FF game.
I don't think it's a sbad as some pepole say it is. It's a pretty solid game. Not worth paying top dollar for, but for the right price, I'd get it.
Stay away from that game!
i don't like the game.... terrible.. i just played it for the story.
Well since hearing its bad i never played it.
Wow, this is more unanimous than I expected. I guess it really does suck. Alas.
= not fun
its a load of crap
It was pretty terrible. Im not going to lie and say i finished it because i didnt....i just couldnt stomach such mediocrity.
not really it was label bad for the fans of the game where hoping to have and rpg but then got a 3rd person shooter so thats why it's bad for my oppinniion i think that this game is just good
i played a little of it and for a 3rd person shooter its decent with a good backstory. i think the ff7 fans were expecting some kind of ''uber-epikz gamezorz'' and instead got a decent 3rd person shooter with some nice cg scenes.
As a final fantasy fan I really enjoyed it, it's kinda like a shooter with rp:Dg elements but well worth a try if you can get it cheap.Does get a bit repetetive later on in the game.. but I wasn't bothered, I wrote a review for it, If you visit my profile you should find it :D
Dirge isn't what I would call a bad game. It looks very nice, and it's got a decent soundtrack and good voice acting going for it. Part of what everyone hated about it was that they just expected a much better game because it had Final Fantasy in the title. Dirge of Cerberus isn't a great game, but it's certainly not bad. It's short, but the story is good, and if your really big on the FF7 story and characters there is a lot of neat stuff going on. If your only a passing fan of FF7, passing meaning played it once and didn't really get the story but thought it was cool, then you'll get even less out of it. If you've played FF7 enough times to get the story as well as Crisis Core and watched Advent Children you'll get a lot more out of it. I'm a big FF 7 fan and I actually rather enjoyed Dirge of Cerberus. Thing is that I knew it wasn't going to be amazing. If you play it expecting little (aka an open mind) you shouldn't have trouble having a good time.
the things I've heard about Dirge of Cerberus is that the game is 'decent' but only made better by how much you're a FFVII fanboy
[QUOTE=''Ice_52'']It's a VERY tedious game. I rented it and played a little while through and saw no reason to finish it[/QUOTE] Same.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)